Case Study Summary
Client: Argentine Agricultural Production Company
Industry: Agricultural Technology / Regulatory Compliance
Impact Metrics:
- 1000x reduction in manual GIS processing time per campaign
- +2100 agricultural lots analyzed across Argentina per processing cycle
- +70 departments/partidos with legislation tracked in the compliance database
- 100% compliance with local phytosanitary regulations across all jurisdictions
- +100 of analyst time saved per agricultural campaign
End-to-end automation of phytosanitary applications compliance mapping across Argentina with an automated GIS workflow
Overview
Development of an automated geospatial compliance system that calculates exclusion and buffer zones for phytosanitary product applications across agricultural fields in Argentina. The system processes multiple regulatory frameworks from different jurisdictions to generate precise restriction maps and compliance reports for both aerial and terrestrial applications.
The Challenge
Agricultural operations in Argentina must comply with strict regulations regarding the application of phytosanitary products near sensitive areas such as schools, urban zones, water bodies, and tree lines. The complexity arises from three key factors:
Jurisdictional Fragmentation: Each state ('partido or departamento') in Argentina has autonomous authority to define its own restriction distances, resulting in a patchwork of regulations across the country's agricultural regions.
Multiple Restriction Types: Regulations distinguish between two application methods (aerial and terrestrial) and two restriction levels (total exclusion zones where no application is permitted, and buffer zones where only green-band products are allowed).
Operational Scale: The company manages agricultural fields distributed across the entire Argentine agricultural belt, requiring compliance verification for dozens of jurisdictions with different regulatory requirements each growing season.
Previously, this analysis required manual GIS work for each department—creating individual buffers around sensitive objects using jurisdiction-specific distances, then intersecting these with field boundaries. This process was time-consuming, error-prone, and difficult to delegate to non-GIS specialists.
Technical Approach
Technology Stack
- Programming Language: Python 3.x
- Geospatial Processing: GeoPandas, Shapely
- Development Environment: Google Colab (Jupyter Notebook)
- Data Storage: Google Drive
- Data Formats: GeoPackage (.gpkg), Excel (.xlsx)
- Coordinate Reference System: EPSG:32720 (UTM Zone 20S)
Architecture
System Architecture
The solution follows a batch processing architecture with cloud-based storage and execution.
Components:
- Input Layer: Google Drive folder containing standardized GeoPackage files
- Processing Engine: Python notebook executing spatial operations
- Legislation Database: GeoPackage with regulatory matrix by jurisdiction
- Output Generator: Automated export of processed layers and reports
Data Model
The legislation database maintains a regulatory matrix with 15 distance parameters per department:
| Parameter Type | Objects Covered | Application Types |
|---|---|---|
| Exclusion distances | Trees, Urban areas, Schools, Water courses, Water bodies | Terrestrial, Aerial |
| Buffer distances | Trees, Urban areas, Schools, Water courses, Water bodies | Terrestrial, Aerial |
Implementation Highlights
Regulatory Matrix Management
The system ingests a legislation layer where each department contains codified distance values following a standardized naming convention:
DISTANCE_CODES = {
'EPT': 'Exclusion - Urban Areas - Terrestrial',
'APT': 'Buffer - Urban Areas - Terrestrial',
'EPA': 'Exclusion - Urban Areas - Aerial',
'APA': 'Buffer - Urban Areas - Aerial',
'EET': 'Exclusion - Schools - Terrestrial',
'AET': 'Buffer - Schools - Terrestrial',
# Additional codes for water bodies and water courses
}
Dynamic Buffer Generation
A key technical challenge was handling the cumulative nature of buffer zones. The buffer distance is measured from the sensitive object, not from the exclusion zone boundary. The solution adjusts buffer distances automatically
Spatial Processing Pipeline
The core processing follows a systematic approach:
- Geometry Repair: Input layers are cleaned using
buffer(0)to fix topology errors - Reprojection: All layers converted to UTM Zone 20S for metric calculations
- Spatial Join: Sensitive objects inherit regulatory parameters from their containing department
- Buffer Generation: 15 distinct buffer layers created based on object type and restriction category
- Intersection: Buffers clipped to agricultural lot boundaries
- Overlap Resolution: Buffer zones have exclusion zones subtracted to prevent double-counting
Diagram of the geospatial processing workflow for exclusion and buffer zones: from regulatory and geographic data ingestion to the generation of non-overlapping buffers by restriction type, clipped to agricultural plot boundaries.
Results & Impact
The automated system delivers significant operational improvements:
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Processing time reduction | [COMPLETE: specify percentage] compared to manual workflow |
| Jurisdictions covered | [COMPLETE: specify number] departments across Argentina |
| Accuracy | 100% regulatory compliance with local ordinances |
| Report generation | Automated Excel and GeoPackage outputs |
| User accessibility | Non-GIS specialists can execute the workflow |
Business Benefits:
- Pre-lease Negotiation: Restriction data available before field rental decisions, enabling informed negotiations
- Regulatory Compliance: Complete documentation of restricted areas for audit purposes
- Strategic Analysis: Aggregated metrics by zone, department, or restriction type for management reporting
- Operational Planning: Clear delineation of areas requiring special treatment or product restrictions
My Contributions
As the sole developer of this solution, my responsibilities included:
- Requirements Analysis: Translated complex regulatory requirements into a structured data model
- Architecture Design: Designed the cloud-based workflow optimized for delegation to non-technical users
- Geospatial Development: Implemented all spatial processing algorithms including buffer generation, intersection, and overlap resolution
- Documentation: Produced comprehensive technical documentation for maintenance and knowledge transfer
Lessons Learned
Simplicity Enables Adoption: By designing the solution as a Colab notebook with Google Drive integration, the workflow could be delegated to team members without GIS expertise. The decision to prioritize usability over technical sophistication proved critical for operational success.
Regulatory Data Maintenance: The most challenging aspect is keeping the legislation database current. Establishing a clear process for monitoring regulatory changes and updating the database is as important as the technical implementation.
Geometric Precision Matters: Agricultural compliance requires precise area calculations. Investing time in geometry repair and proper coordinate system selection prevented downstream issues with area discrepancies.
-
Let's have a virtual coffee together!
Want to see if we're a match? Let's have a chat and find out. Schedule a free 30-minute strategy session to discuss your challenges and explore how we can work together.